The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7968•James B. Weersing v. S. Captain, Shift Supervisor
03-7968Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7968
JAMES B. WEERSING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
S. CAPTAIN, SHIFT SUPERVISOR; C. MITCHELL,
Grievance Officer; CALVIN ANTHONY, Warden;
GARY MAYNARD, Director, South Carolina
Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-01-308-8-24BI)
Submitted: June 30, 2004 Decided: July 19, 2004
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James B. Weersing, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS
& MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James B. Weersing appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice
for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Weersing v. Sanyo, No.
CA-01-308-8-24BI (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.