James A.g. Bunch, Jr v. THEODIS BECK, Secretary

03-7823Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 4, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7823
JAMES A.G. BUNCH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THEODIS BECK, Secretary; BOYD BENNETT,
Director; RANDALL LEE; ROBERT SMITH; ERNEST
SUTTON; UNKNOWN SUPERINTENDENT, Central
Prison; UNKNOWN SUPERINTENDENT, Nash
C o r r e c t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n ; U N K N O W N
SUPERINTENDENT, Pender Correctional
Institution; UNKNOWN SUPERINTENDENT, Wayne
C o r r e c t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n ; U N K N O W N
SUPERINTENDENT, Marion Correctional
Institution; LAWRENCE SOLOMON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-741-5-BO)
Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: August 4, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A.G. Bunch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
James A.G. Bunch, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Bunch v. Beck, No. CA-03-
741-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.