The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7796•United States of America v. William M. Bryson, Jr
03-7796Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7796
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-01-240)
Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: March 31, 2004
Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra
Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R.
Crim. P. 41. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Floyd v. United States, 860 F.2d 999, 1003 (10th Cir. 1988). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.