The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7753•Thomas Lattie McLamb v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 2 - PER…
03-7753Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 9, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7753
THOMAS LATTIE MCLAMB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. F. DALIUS, Warden; KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER,
Director; J. FRANK BRADSHER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-662-5-BO)
Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 9, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Lattie McLamb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lattie McLamb appeals the district court’s order
and order on reconsideration denying his Bivens* claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See McLamb v. Dalius, No. CA-03-
662-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8 & Oct. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.