United States of America v. Joseph Lewis Pullen, Sr

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7743
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH LEWIS PULLEN, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 03-7783
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH LEWIS PULLEN, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 03-7784
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
versus
JOSEPH LEWIS PULLEN, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CR-01-133)
Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Lewis Pullen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant,
II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Joseph Lewis Pullen, Sr.,
appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for
electronic monitoring/home incarceration, denying his motion for
personal recognizance bond pending appeal, and denying his motion
for reconsideration for electronic monitoring/home confinement. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Pullen, No. CR-01-133 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2003;
Sept. 26, 2003; Nov. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --