The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7729•Jason Ortega v. Kathleen Hawk Sawyer
03-7729Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7729
JASON ORTEGA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER; EDUARDO GONZALAS; GEORGE
R. HAVENS; JOHN W. MARSHALL; WILLIE SCOTT; BOB
GUZIK; RONALD J. ANGELONE; TRACY RAY; S. K.
YOUNG; PAUL LANTEIGNE; MCCABE; JERRY BROWN; G.
F. DRISCOLL; REVA L. BEDWELL; FLENNOR; FAULKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-109-3)
Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Ortega, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jason Ortega appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Ortega v. Sawyer, No.
CA-03-109-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.