The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7714•Coleman A. Stigall, Iii v. LEVESTER THOMPSON, Physician, Nottoway Correctional Center
03-7714Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7714
COLEMAN A. STIGALL, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LEVESTER THOMPSON, Physician, Nottoway
Correctional Center; NASEER MOBASHAR, Doctor,
Buckingham Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-02-1281-7)
Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 12, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Coleman A. Stigall, III, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph McNelis,
III, John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Coleman A. Stigall, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Stigall v. Thompson, No. CA-02-1281-7 (W.D. Va.
Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.