The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7710•Sterling Boone v. RANDY LEE, Superintendent
03-7710Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7710
STERLING BOONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RANDY LEE, Superintendent; WILLIAM MAYO,
Sargeant; JEFF BATTLE; LENWOOD KNIGHT; RICKY
ANDERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (CA-03-722-5-FL)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sterling Boone, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sterling Boone appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Boone’s motion to
proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Boone v. Lee, No. CA-03-722-
5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.