United States of America v. Clinton Green, a/k/a Blue

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7611
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
versus
CLINTON GREEN, a/k/a Blue,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II,
District Judge. (CR-95-97; CA-03-395-2)
Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 9, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton Green, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminski Schwartz, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Clinton Green appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582
(2000). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Green, Nos. CR-95-97; CA-
03-395-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 18, 2003). We grant Green’s motion to
proceed in forma pauperis, deny as unnecessary his motion for a
certificate of appealability, and deny his motion to remand and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --