The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7588•United States of America v. WILLIE EDWARD HOPKINS, III, a/k/a W. E. Hopkins, a/k/a Bill Hopkins, a/k/a Willie…
03-7588Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7588
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIE EDWARD HOPKINS, III, a/k/a W. E.
Hopkins, a/k/a Bill Hopkins, a/k/a Willie
Hopkins, a/k/a Little Bill, a/k/a Bill, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CR-97-9-2-3)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Edward Hopkins, III, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Willie Edward Hopkins, III, appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction of his
sentence. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Hopkins v. United States, No. CR-97-9-2-3 (E.D. Va.
Aug. 7, 2003 & Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.