The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7566•Donald L. Rice v. ZORO J. GUICE, JR., The Honorable
03-7566Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 8, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7566
DONALD L. RICE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ZORO J. GUICE, JR., The Honorable,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-90-1-1-MU)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 8, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald L. Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald L. Rice appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Rice v. Guice, No. CA-03-90-1-
1-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 17, 2003 & entered Sept. 22, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.