The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7563•Robert A. Cuffee v. SERGEANT LUKER, Corrections Officer
03-7563Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7563
ROBERT A. CUFFEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT LUKER, Corrections Officer; DOCTOR
REESE; DOCTOR OBER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-678)
Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert A. Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY
& WINDELS, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert A. Cuffee appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cuffee v.
Luker, No. CA-02-678 (W.D. Va. July 30, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.