The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7536•James A. G. Bunch, Jr v. RANDALL LEE, Superintendent
03-7536Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7536
JAMES A. G. BUNCH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RANDALL LEE, Superintendent; NURSE EMERY, RN
Supervisor; DOCTOR CROCKRAN, Physician;
J. A. DOBBEN, Grievance Examiner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (CA-03-654-5-FL)
Submitted: February 9, 2004 Decided: March 31, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. G. Bunch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James A. G. Bunch, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bunch v. Lee,
No. CA-03-654-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.