The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7487•United States of America v. Herman Wooden
03-7487Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 3, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7487
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERMAN WOODEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CR-90-18; CA-96-1591-A)
Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: February 3, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herman Wooden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Herman Wooden appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for post conviction relief and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant Wooden leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm the decision of the district court because
Wooden was not entitled to a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a) & (c) (2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.