The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7467•United States of America v. Floyd Junior “dick” Powell
03-7467Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7467
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FLOYD JUNIOR “DICK” POWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-99-12)
Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Floyd Junior “Dick” Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F.
Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Floyd Junior “Dick” Powell appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to stay the sale of forfeited real property. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Powell, No. CR-99-12 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.