The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7458•United States of America v. James Harrison Singletary
03-7458Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 6, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7458
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES HARRISON SINGLETARY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-98-240)
Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Harrison Singletary, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Harrison Singletary appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to dismiss his indictment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Singletary, No. CR-98-240 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 21, 2003 & entered
Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.