The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7456•John Patrick McSheffrey v. JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden
03-7456Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 16, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7456
JOHN PATRICK MCSHEFFREY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-03-663)
Submitted: December 18, 2003 Decided: January 16, 2004
Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Patrick McSheffrey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Patrick McSheffrey, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See McSheffrey v. Brooks, No. CA-
03-663 (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.