Rodney White v. Counselor Clark

03-7390Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 13, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7390
RODNEY WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COUNSELOR CLARK; LIEUTENANT COMPTON; SERGEANT
ANDERSON; JESSEE; WARDEN YOUNG; INVESTIGATOR
WILLIAMS; MAJOR YATES; B. J. DAVIS, Operations
Officer; WARDEN PHILLIS; S. RIDER; R. RAVIZEE,
Grievance Department; L. HUFFMAN, Regional
Director; SERGEANT COPE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-03-392-7)
Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney White, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Fernell White appeals from the dismissal of his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to state a claim pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Thus, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. White v. Clark, No. CA-03-
392-7 (W.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.