The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7381•Allan L. Gant v. Office of the United States Attorney, Southern District of West Virginia
03-7381Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7381
ALLAN L. GANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-02-1145-2)
Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 22, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Allan L. Gant appeals the district court’s order and judgment
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
Gant’s civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Gant v. Office of the United States Attorney,
No. CA-02-1145-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.