The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7375•George Reynold Evans v. J. SHOAF, Detective
03-7375Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 13, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7375
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. SHOAF, Detective; T. A. WEAVIL, Officer;
SERGEANT FRY; CITY OF WILMINGTON, NORTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle,
Chief District Judge. (CA-03-8)
Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: May 13, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Reynold Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
George Reynold Evans appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Evans v. Shoaf, No. CA-03-8 (E.D.N.C. July
29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.