The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7364•Antwon Edwards v. ROBERT KUPEC, Warden
03-7364Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 5, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7364
ANTWON EDWARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT KUPEC, Warden; MAJOR WILLIAM MACOCK;
DAVID TWILLEY, Sergeant; DONALD ADAMS,
Correctional Officer II; COSIMO GIORDANO,
Lieutenant; ROBERT RITCHEY, Chief; WILLIAM
SONDERVAN, Commissioner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
03-891-DKC)
Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 5, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwon Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Antwon Edwards appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Edwards v. Kupec, No. CA-
03-891-DKC (D. Md. filed July 29, 2003 & entered July 30, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.