The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7356•United States of America v. Michael A. Harris
03-7356Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7356
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL A. HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-1)
Submitted: March 19, 2004 Decided: April 12, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Harris appeals the district court’s orders
denying his “Motion for Downward Departure and/or Relief from
Sentencing Enhancements Through Reconsideration of a Sentence of
Imprisonment” and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Harris, No. CR-93-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2003 & Sept. 2, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.