United States of America v. Hilton Thomas, a/k/a Dinkles

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7349
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HILTON THOMAS, a/k/a Dinkles,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CR-97-355-WMN)
Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: February 27, 2004
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hilton Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Robert Reeves
Harding, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Hilton Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 motion for a new trial. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Hilton, No. CR-97-355-WMN (D. Md. July 30, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --