The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7342•Reginald E. Paylor v. ERNEST SUTTON, Superintendent
03-7342Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7342
REGINALD E. PAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ERNEST SUTTON, Superintendent; JAY MARROW,
Medical Administrator; MICHAEL BAKER,
Administrative Officer; DAVID O’NEIL, Clothes
House Officer; SIVARA MANICKAVASAGAR, Doctor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-507-5-BO)
Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald E. Paylor, Appellant Pro Se. Deborrah Lynn Newton,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; John Walton
Minier, YATES, MCLAMB & WEYHER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM
Reginald Paylor appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the Defendants and dismissing Paylor’s
action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Paylor v. Sutton,
No. CA-02-507-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.