The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7293•United States of America v. Monroe Crowner Harrod
03-7293Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7293
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MONROE CROWNER HARROD,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
ONE 1993 CADILLAC SEVILLE STS; ONE 1997 FORD
EXPEDITION; $20,222.00 U.S. CURRENCY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-02-2816-WDQ)
Submitted: February 2, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monroe Crowner Harrod, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Monroe Crowner Harrod appeals the district court’s order,
entered after a bench trial, forfeiting certain property to the
United States. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Harrod, No. CA-02-2816-WDQ
(D. Md. July 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.