The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7285•Juan Jose Dupree v. Sergeant L. Brown
03-7285Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7285
JUAN JOSE DUPREE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT L. BROWN; LIEUTENANT WOODRUM; CAPTAIN
D. CROWDER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
02-3515-RDB)
Submitted: February 25, 2004 Decided: March 16, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Jose Dupree, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Juan Jose Dupree appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See
Dupree v. Brown, No. CA-02-3515-RDB (D. Md. June 30, 2003). We
conclude that Dupree’s claim that prison conditions violate the
Eighth Amendment is meritless. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.