The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7269•United States of America v. LEONARD SHELTON MCCULLOUGH, JR., a/k/a Lennie Boo
03-7269Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 4, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7269
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
versus
LEONARD SHELTON MCCULLOUGH, JR., a/k/a Lennie
Boo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock,
Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-195, CA-03-204-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard Shelton McCullough, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander
Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Leonard Shelton McCullough, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying
his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McCullough,
Nos. CR-96-195; CA-03-204-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.