The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7134•United States of America v. David M. Scates
03-7134Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 4, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7134
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID M. SCATES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-98-87)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Scates, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Noelle
Dalrymple, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David M. Scates seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his motion
for criminal contempt. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Scates, No. CR-98-87 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.