Edward L. Mosely v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The magistrate judge’s…

03-7132Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 10, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7132
EDWARD L. MOSELY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia
Department of Corrections,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. James E. Bradberry, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-02-563-2)
Submitted: September 25, 2003 Decided: October 10, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward L. Mosely, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward L. Mosely seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to dismiss his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The
magistrate judge’s recommendation Mosely seeks to appeal is neither
a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
See Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217, 1219 (10th Cir. 1999).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.