The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7059•Mauricio Mack Gill v. GARY WATERS, Portsmouth Sheriff
03-7059Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 10, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7059
MAURICIO MACK GILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GARY WATERS, Portsmouth Sheriff,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-03-432-2)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mauricio Mack Gill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mauricio Mack Gill appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gill v.
Waters, No. CA-03-432-2 (E.D. Va. entered June 20, 2003; filed
July 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.