Demetric Gray Pearson v. Mary Ann Saar

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7004
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARY ANN SAAR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
03-1495-RDB, CA-03-1496-RDB)
Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 24, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Pearson’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Pearson v. Saar, Nos. CA-03-1495-RDB, CA-03-1496-RDB
(D. Md. filed June 16, 2003 & entered June 17, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --