The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6997•Cleveland McLean, Jr v. ROBERT BOHANNON, Bohannon, Bohannon & Hancock, Attorneys at Law
03-6997Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6997
CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT BOHANNON, Bohannon, Bohannon & Hancock,
Attorneys at Law; JAMES O. BROCCOLETTI, Zoby &
Broccoletti, Attorneys at Law,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-03-336-2)
Submitted: October 15, 2003 Decided: March 16, 2004
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland McLean, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See McLean v. Bohannon,
No. CA-03-336-2 (E.D. Va. May 21, 2003). We deny McLean’s motion
for attorney’s fees. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.