The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6972•James Calhoun-El v. SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden
03-6972Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 15, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6972
JAMES CALHOUN-EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ANTONIO X. ENGLISH; RICHARD LAWRENCE-EL;
RODMEN LEE,
Plaintiffs,
versus
SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; KNOWN AND UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS OF THE ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
02-2729-JFM)
Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 15, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
James Calhoun-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
James Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, denying
his motion to amend the pleadings, and denying his motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See English v. Smith, No. CA-02-2729 (D. Md.
filed June 3, 2003; entered June 4, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.