The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6971•Bernard Gregory Lamp v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . Because the district court…
03-6971Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6971
BERNARD GREGORY LAMP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
DONALD WAYNE DAY,
Plaintiff,
versus
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, State Agency; GENE
JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections; CAROL WALLACE, Warden; GARY
GRAHAM, Operations Officer; JOHN DOES; JANE
DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-03-12-3)
Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 21, 2003
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Gregory Lamp, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Walter Kilgore,
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Gregory Lamp seeks to appeal the order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). Because the district court dismissed
fewer than all claims of all parties in the order Lamp seeks to
appeal, the order is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.