The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6969•David Yi v. JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden
03-6969Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6969
DAVID YI,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-03-385-3)
Submitted: October 29, 2003 Decided: November 17, 2003
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Yi, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Yi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Yi v. Brooks, No. CA-03-385-3 (E.D. Va.
filed June 10, 2003 & entered June 11, 2003). We deny Yi’s motion
for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.