The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6950•Timothy Lamont Hazel v. MS. PARKER, Correctional Officer, Nash Correctional Institution
03-6950Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 22, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6950
TIMOTHY LAMONT HAZEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MS. PARKER, Correctional Officer, Nash
Correctional Institution; NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Head of the NCDOC
Division of Prisons @ 831 West Morgan Street,
Raleigh, NC 27603,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-03-358-5-H)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Lamont Hazel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Lamont Hazel appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hazel v.
Parker, No. CA-03-358-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.