The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6935•Luther Jenkins, Iv v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . 2 PER…
03-6935Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 22, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6935
LUTHER JENKINS, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. F. DALIUS, Warden; D. FONDREN, Captain;
EDUARDO CAMACHO, Captain; LIEUTENANT DODSON,
SIS; MR. GIGLIOTTI, Kitchen Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-03-271-5-H)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luther Jenkins, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
2
PER CURIAM:
Luther Jenkins, IV, appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his Bivens * complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Jenkins v. Dalius, No. CA-03-
271-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2003 & entered May 14, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.