Michael F. Crosby v. Deputy R.k. Alford

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6831
MICHAEL F. CROSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPUTY R.K. ALFORD; DEPUTY M. NAGEL; DEPUTY
CHILDREN; MASTER DEPUTY WILLIAMS; DEPUTY H.K.
STIFFLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-01-781)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael F. Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael F. Crosby appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both
orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crosby v.
Alford, No. CA-01-781 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9 and May 7, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --