(CA-02-1885-7-20) Bobby M. Linder v. C. L. Miller

03-6812Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2003

Full text

Filed: July 22, 2003
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6812
(CA-02-1885-7-20)
Bobby M. Linder,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. L. Miller, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed July 17, 2003, as follows:
On the cover sheet, section 2 -- the name “Handy” is corrected
to read “Hardy.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk

-- 1 of 3 --

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6812
BOBBY M. LINDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. L. MILLER; RANDY HARDY, Captain; MAJOR
BROWN; TONY FISHER, Chief,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-1885-7-20)
Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 17, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby M. Linder, Appellant Pro Se. James Dean Jolly, Jr., LOGAN,
JOLLY & SMITH, L.L.P., Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Bobby M. Linder appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Linder v. Miller, No. CA-
02-1885-7-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.