The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6809•Richard J. Harley v. Robert P. Shearin
03-6809Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 17, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6809
RICHARD J. HARLEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT P. SHEARIN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
03-711-CCB)
Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 17, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard J. Harley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard J. Harley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000), and his motions for release and to alter or amend
the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Harley v. Shearin, No. CA-03-711-CCB (D. Md. filed Mar.
26, 2003, entered Mar. 27, 2003; filed Apr. 4, 2003, entered Apr.
7, 2003; filed Apr. 24, 2003, entered Apr. 28, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.