The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6796•Charles B. Stewart, Jr v. WILLIAM J. SMITH, Warden of Patuxent Institution
03-6796Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6796
CHARLES B. STEWART, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. SMITH, Warden of Patuxent
Institution; R. DANIELS, Correctional Officer,
II,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.
(CA-03-666-L)
Submitted: January 30, 2004 Decided: February 12, 2004
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles B. Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles B. Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). He also appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Stewart v. Smith, No. CA-03-666-L (D. Md.
April 3, 2003 & May 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.