Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey v. Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center

03-6793Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 21, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6793
MALCOM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward
Janey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUSTMENT CENTER;
MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION, Inmate
Accounts Personnel; INMATE ACCOUNTS
SUPERVISOR; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; SEWALL
SMITH, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-2543-1-AH)
Submitted: June 20, 2003 Decided: July 21, 2003
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Malcom Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland
Correctional Adjustment Ctr., No. CA-02-2543-1-AH (D. Md. filed
Mar. 31, 2003 & entered Apr. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.