The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6769•Patrice Munselle Carter v. Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women
03-6769Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 8, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6769
PATRICE MUNSELLE CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FLUVANNA CORRECTIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN;
PATRICIA HUFFMAN, Warden; FLUVANNA MEDICAL
DEPARTMENT, Health Services; FRED SCHILLING;
FAYE GARNETT; ANTHONY LYNCH, Director of
Nurses,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-03-286-7)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 8, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrice Munselle Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patrice Munselle Carter appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. Fluvanna Corr.
Ctr. for Women, No. CA-03-286-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2003). We deny
the motion for appointment of appellate counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.