The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6709•United States of America v. Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, a/k/a Tynell
03-6709Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 21, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6709
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALDO TYNELL LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Tynell,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CR-98-150)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 21, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Lightfoot, No. CR-98-150
(E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.