The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6692•Edward Wayne Gibson v. LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden
03-6692Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 16, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6692
EDWARD WAYNE GIBSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden; DOCTOR MOORE,
Assistant Warden/Operations; DOCTOR JOHNS,
Medical Staff Deep Meadow Correctional Center;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-01-404)
Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 16, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Wayne Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Richard
Samuel Samet, GOODMAN, ALLEN & FILETTI, Glen Allen, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Wayne Gibson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Gibson v. Kelly, No.
CA-01-404 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2002; Feb. 5, 2003; Apr. 4, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.