The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6683•Vincent Depaul Medley v. P. A. TERRANGI, Warden
03-6683Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 29, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6683
VINCENT DEPAUL MEDLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
P. A. TERRANGI, Warden; MAXINE PORCHER, T.C.
Director; S. CHRIS JONES, Assistant Programs,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-03-224-2)
Submitted: June 18, 2003 Decided: October 29, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent DePaul Medley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vincent DePaul Medley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Medley v. Terrangi, No. CA-03-224-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr.
17, 2003 & entered Apr. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.