The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6673•Charles Millard v. Arcangelo M. Tuminelli
03-6673Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6673
CHARLES MILLARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARCANGELO M. TUMINELLI,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-03-970-8-AW)
Submitted: June 25, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003
Before WIDENER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Millard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Millard appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Millard v. Tuminelli, No. CA-03-970-8-AW
(D. Md. Apr. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.