The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6651•Keith S. Davis v. WALTER W. STOUT, Judge
03-6651Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 10, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6651
KEITH S. DAVIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WALTER W. STOUT, Judge; K. SCOTT MILES, Public
Defender; MICHELLE B. MITCHELL, Richmond City
Jail Sheriff,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (CA-03-259-2)
Submitted: May 28, 2003 Decided: June 10, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith S. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith S. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Davis v. Stout, No. CA-03-259-2
(E.D. Va. April 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.