Dan Oliver v. K. Osborne

03-6621Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 25, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6621
DAN OLIVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
K. OSBORNE,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 03-6622
DAN OLIVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
K. OSBORNE; DOCTOR RAYNARD; DOCTOR CARBONE;
WYATT, Correctional Officer; SMITH,
Correctional Officer; FIREBAUGH, Correctional
Officer; VANHAY, Correctional Officer;
HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Marion
Correctional Treatment Center; P. TRUE,
Warden; PIXLEY, Assistant Warden; KEELING,
Assistant Warden; CLARKE, Operational Officer;
MOREHEAD, Correctional Officer; SUSSEX I STATE
PRISON; FLEMING, Regional Director; DOCTOR
LOVE; RONALD ANGELONE, former Director,
Virginia Department of Corrections; BARBARA
MASON,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-03-43, CA-03-9)
Submitted: August 22, 2003 Decided: September 25, 2003
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dan Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s orders denying relief
without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2000), and denying his motions to
amend and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Oliver v. Osborne, Nos. CA-03-
43; CA-03-9 (W.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2003; Feb. 26, 2003; Mar. 27, 2003).
Oliver’s motions for general relief, for emergency relief, and for
appointment of counsel, as supplemented, are denied. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.