The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6589•Buddy Mason v. Ron Angelone
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6589
BUDDY MASON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RON ANGELONE; L. JARVIS; DR. HARLAND; NENA
ADAMS; MARK E. WILLIAMS, D.D.S.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-309-7)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 21, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Buddy Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Leonard Taylor, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
George W. Wooten, Peter Duane Vieth, Eunice Park Austin, WOOTEN &
HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Buddy Mason appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Mason v. Angelone,
No. CA-01-309-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.